The Fair Tax: Is It Fair?
October 15, 2012 6 Comments
What is the Fair Tax… other than the Libertarian platform for tax reform? According to FairTax.org, “The Fair Tax Plan is a comprehensive proposal that replaces all federal income and payroll based taxes with an integrated approach including a progressive national retail sales tax, a prebate to ensure no American pays federal taxes on spending up to the poverty level, dollar-for-dollar federal revenue replacement, and, through companion legislation, repeal of the 16th Amendment. This nonpartisan legislation (HR 25/S 1025) abolishes all federal personal and corporate income taxes, gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare, and self-employment taxes and replaces them with one simple, visible, federal retail sales tax.” It sounds like a lot, but it is a relatively simple idea… and one that could possibly simply by the tax codes.
We all know that the federal government needs taxes in order to pay for things. Up until the passage of the 16th Amendment almost 100-years ago, the government collected its tax dollars from alcohol sales. But since the amendment’s passage, it’s been income taxes, which have become more and more complex over time. In 1913, there were only 400-pages of federal tax codes, regulations, and IRS rulings. Today, that number has grown to 73,608-pages. And the compliance burden on the taxpayers to pay their taxes correctly is costing us $431.1-billion a year. This can be broken down into Time Value Costs ($377.9-billion), Direct Outlays ($31.5-billion), IRS Administrative Costs ($12.4-billion), and Comprehensive Tax Audits ($9.3-billion). So basically, we are spending 30% of our tax dollars just to pay our taxes. The Libertarian Party’s approach is to simplify all of this by abolishing all federal income taxes and replacing it with a simpler federal retail sales tax.
With the Fair Tax, people would take home 100% of their paychecks… except where state income taxes apply. It would establish a uniform tax across the board on all new items at 23%. Why 23%? At that level, it’s becomes revenue neutral. The government takes in exactly what it is taking in now. A large argument against such a tax plan is that it would favor the wealthy over the poor as the poor already have trouble being able to afford items. This is solved though by a monthly prebate that all American citizens (those with Social Security cards) would receive to cover the tax spent on necessities up to the federal poverty level. A single person would receive a monthly prebate of $199. A 2-adult, 2-children household would receive a monthly prebate of $537. (Numbers based on the Department of Health and Human Services 2008 Poverty Guidelines) And also note that I’ve been saying that the Fair Tax only applies to new goods. That’s because you would not be paying the tax on used items as they were already taxed once before. So if you bought a used car, a used house, use clothing, etc., there would be no federal tax at all. It’s only applied to new goods and services, and it can only be charged one time… right when you make the purchase.
Did you know that when you buy something, that you are paying for the company’s corporate taxes plus their compliance costs? Corporations have to pay payroll taxes and make contributions into Social Security and Medicare. All of this is passed along to the consumers at a higher price. With the Fair Tax, corporate income taxes would be abolished, too. No longer would corporations have to hide these taxes in higher retail prices. Prices are allowed to drop then without revenue or profit being affected. This could allow a company to employ more people. And before you start thinking that corporations don’t pay taxes under the Fair Tax, FairTax.org states, “Corporations are legal fictions that have not, do not, and never will bear the burden of taxation. Only people pay taxes. Corporations pass on their tax burden in the form of higher prices to consumers, lower wages to workers, and/or lower returns to investors.” And when it comes to jobs and exporting/importing goods, “the Fair Tax does not burden U.S. exports the way the current income tax does. The Fair Tax removes the cost of corporate taxes and compliance costs from the cost of U.S. exports, putting U.S. exports on a level playing field with foreign competitors. Lower prices sharply increase demand for U.S. exports, thereby increasing job creation in U.S. manufacturing sectors. At home, imports are subject to the same Fair Tax rate as domestically produced goods.”
So what about Social Security and Medicare? They come out of our paychecks. Our tax dollars specifically pay for them. They actually stay the same… maybe coming out a bit ahead. Instead of the money coming from our paychecks, they come from the tax dollars on the new goods and services we buy. Spending by Americans is usually more constant than income levels. Currently, Social Security and Medicare funds are taxed three times: 1) when payroll taxes are initially withheld, 2) when those withheld payroll taxes are counted as part of the taxable base for income tax, and 3) when the promised benefits are finally received. This would completely negate all of that until you spent it on some new good or service. And with the Fair Tax, both programs would have a wider base participating in the program… which, if you think about it, would include all members of Congress.
So are there any countries today that use this type of taxation? The simple answer is no though the states of Florida and Texas use a similar system for their state taxes. However, in England after the defeat of Napoleon, did repeal its income taxes and had major economic gains which only stopped with the re-imposition of the income tax. Now what about state sales taxes. States will have the choice to participate or not… meaning they can keep their current state sales tax on items or they can choose to go to the federal sales tax, in which they would receive a fee for their participation that would take the place of their state sales tax. They cannot do both. And with the IRS gone, who collects the taxes? Pretty much everywhere you buy things… just like they do now with state sales taxes. In the end, you get to determine how much you pay in taxes by how much you spend on new goods and services. This is also the only plan that calls for the full repeal of the 16th Amendment, though even without it, there would still not be a federal income tax and a federal sales tax. The 16th Amendment only gives Congress the right to tax our income, but it doesn’t state that there has to be an income tax.
I want to close with a few examples from FairTax.org. This might help in seeing how this would affect us all. Under our current income tax system, let’s say that you earn $100. You get to keep $77, so your income tax rate is 23%, and the government keeps $23. Now let’s move to the Fair Tax. You again earn $100. You get to keep $100, and you choose to spend $77. Your Fair Tax rate is 30%, and the government only gets $23. Now that was based just on an individual. Now let’s look at different income levels and how they are taxed under the Fair Tax. Let’s say a billionaire (who is married with no children) spends $10-million and pays a tax of $2.3-million. He gets a prebate of $4,697. His tax rate is 22.95%. Now let’s look at a couple with no children that spends $50,000. They pay a tax of $6,803. The prebate check would be the same as the billionaire’s at $4,697. Their tax rate would be 13.6%. For a quick comparison to today’s income taxes… that same couple that would earn $50,000 would pay a total of $7,918 in taxes (income and payroll taxes). Their tax rate would essentially be 15.8%.
There is a lot of information on the Fair Tax… far more than I can get into. The website does a fairly good job of breaking it all down and making it easy to understand. Whether you are leaning for or against it, I highly encourage everyone to go to the site and look over the details. It may even answer some questions you might have that I haven’t addressed. This was only written to be a summary and to be a brief introduction… not an endorsement. So check it out and feel free to leave feedback below. There will also be some added shortcuts linked below, too.
SIDENOTE:
All quotes are from FairTax.org unless otherwise stated.
LINKS:
Thumbnail Sketch of the Fair Tax with FAQ (pdf)
Income Tax vs. Fair Tax vs. Flat Tax (pdf)
The Fair Tax and Business
How Fair Tax Works
In Declaration... 
Reblogged this on Uprising Now.
Previously registered businesses with combined annual withholding, sales/use tax (including sales taxes on meals and telecommunications services) and room occupancy excise liabilities of $10,000 or more are required to file returns and make payments electronically .
Only people pay taxes? [removed by administrator]
Now, knowing that, read Fairtax fine print — not their bullshit hustle, I mean their fine print. Read the part about massive taxes on cities for all wage and pension expenditures. Did you see that part? Hell no.
All cities, under Fairtax, would have to pay taxes on all wage pension and benefit expenditures. In fact, Fairtax has taxes on all city county and states, for all their expenditures- – of any kind — other than education.
So if a state operates a prison system, court system, highway system, they have to pay 23% tax on all those “expenditures” including wage and pension expenditures. But if they run an educational system, that is not taxed.
All cities, all counties, all states. Oh, they don’t tell you that in the books videos or speeches. You could not possibly know it from Fairtax itself, unless you very carefully dissected the fine print. President Bush Tax Advisory Panel had no trouble doing that — either did I. But you probably could not find it.
Fairtax spokesmen admit it — they do in fact tax all city county and states on all expenditures other than education. This is well over 1 trillion dollars — and guess what? Remember you said only PEOPLE pay taxes?
Well, guess who pays these taxes? People — because in Fairtax documents, they admit that all city county and states will have to raise their tax rates to pay for it.
Do they tell you how MUCh they will have to raise taxes? Well, sorta, they say “appropriately” raise taxes. They refuse to explain furthur or give any examples.
But sworn testimony to House Ways Means Committee did show a break down of how many billions city county and states would have to pay, something Fairtax just refuses to do. They try to give the impression its a personal retail tax. Nonsense, the tax on city county and states, combined, is much larrger than the revenue from the tax on personal retail consumption, the kind we transact at the store, get a receipt . In fact, the retail sales tax on that kind of consumption, is about 18% of their revenue. 82% of their revenue is not from that kind of consumption.
YOu also said all prices drop by the amount of the tax. Utter bullshit, and Fairtax claimed Dale Jorgenson of Harvard proved that. Just the opposite — Jorgenson does not support Fairtax whatsoever, and said it can not work, he specifically said that drop in price, keep your whole paycheck thing was not possible. Nor does Jorgenson believe Fairtax can or will tax all city county and states.,
http://fairtaxgoofy.blogspot.com/
I dislike the Fairtax scheme almost as much as I dislike white on black blogs. Here is the “rest of the story” for those that have only read Fairtax books by advocates.
(1) The Fairtax plan just won’t work! Economists tell us that at sales tax rates above 10%, illegal evasion as well as legal tax avoidance start to increase significantly. And at 30%, the Fairtax plan becomes unworkable. No other nation has ever successfully funded their central government with such a broad based national sales tax. Six have tried, failed and switched to a VAT which has significantly less evasion at higher rates. There is no dual reporting under the Fairtax, and our 20 million retailers would be sorely tempted to “cook their books” in order to avoid sending off the tax revenue to the federal Treasury.
(2) HR25 proposes that the Federal government tax State and Local government purchases of all new goods and all services, including a significant portion of State and Local government employee payrolls as representative of services provided. Under the long held Supreme Court doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity, this taxation would be found to be inappropriate. The 30% exclusive sales tax rate could easily rise to 43% or higher.
(3) Although Fairtaxers claim that the Family Consumption Allowance (FCA) or “prebate” is similar to a tax refund, it is not! The FCA is an income supplement that can be spent (and taxed), or saved as financial circumstances allow. The FCA would be scored by CBO/OMB as a cash grant entitlement costing $600 billion annually at a time when entitlements are squeezing out discretionary spending in the federal budget.
(4) The Fairtax could destroy the new housing market! Banks typically loan the sales price or the appraised value, whichever is less. Appraisers generally do not include commissions or taxes in their valuation. There is no collateral value in a federal sales tax. In order to purchase a new house without mortgage insurance, buyers may have to come up with funds for not only a 20% down payment but also the 30% sales tax at closing.
(5) The National Governors Association opposes any federal tax that would intrude into a tax area that has traditionally been reserved for and relied on by state and local governments. The Fairtax would seriously threaten the ability of state and local governments to maintain their tax base. With this kind of headwind, the States may not be willing to act as the federal tax collector, nor are the States liable to approve repealing the 16th Amendment.
(6) The Fairtax plan would destroy our Social Security system as presently structured. (1) Today, workers typically pay FICA for 45 years or so. Under the Fairtax, everyone pays sales taxes on purchases for all their life. (2) Upon reaching retirement age, today’s workers begin to draw benefits and make no further FICA contributions. Under the Fairtax, everyone, including retirees drawing benefits, continue to pay sales taxes for life. (3) Today, benefit amounts are tied to income earned during work years. But, under the Fairtax, that would be unfair because the Fairtax taxes both income and wealth. A major restructuring of Social Security would be necessary under the Fairtax.
(7) The Fairtax scheme throws middle class retirees under the bus. All after tax savings accumulated under current tax law would be directly double taxed when spent. Retirees would be forced to resume paying for their benefits with their sales tax dollars. Middle class retirees would see a significant increase in their federal tax burden along with a reduction in their purchasing power.
“This was only written to be a summary and to be a brief introduction… not an endorsement.” That sentence is very important. This was meant to be an introduction and to spark factual debate… which it has done. This is not my personal stance. If you are wanting that, then I’ll be happy to answer it… I do not support the Fair Tax at this time. I have not yet been convinced. I support a simple progressive tax rather than the complex system we currently have in place.
The Fair Tax is fair. Anybody with any semblance of common sense would understand this. Why would the Fair Tax face opposition from anybody if everybody benefits from it?